Container based Security and Spring Security

One of the materials on internet that talks about the differences between Container based Security framework and Spring Security is Spring Security FAQ. It lays down the power of Spring Security. Spring MVC based application and other Spring Based application can take advantage of Spring Security

Authentication is a way to provide user identity so that the application identifies who logged into the system. Authorization is a way to tell who can access which part of the application.

As mentioned in that material Container offers Realm based authentication that resides within a containers server.xml vs as opposed to Spring Security that offers Authentication Providers that sits in the application config file,

A simple Realm is Tomcat’s MemoryRealm and it depends on tomcat-users.xml to configure the users, in reality we use LDAP or any database to store user information.

<!-- in the server.xml -->
<Realm className="org.apache.catalina.realm.MemoryRealm" />

<!-- in the tomcat-users.xml -->
<role rolename="secureconn"/>
<user username="client" password="password" roles="secureconn"/>
<role rolename="secureconn1"/>
<user username="client1" password="password" roles="secureconn1"/>

A simple Authentication Provider looks as below, and it is not specific to a container. Again in reality the user information will be in LDAP or Database.

<authentication-manager>
<authentication-provider>
<!-- <password-encoder ref="encoder"/>-->
<user-service id="accountService">
<user name="client" password="" authorities="secureconn" />
<user name="client1" password="" authorities="secureconn1" />
</user-service>
</authentication-provider>
</authentication-manager>

In container based security the Authorization can be achieved by a simple, security constraint mechanism as below,

<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>Demo App</web-resource-name>
<url-pattern>/secure/*</url-pattern>
<http-method>GET</http-method>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<role-name>secureconn</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>

In spring we can achieve Authorization as below, in the spring-security context. The authorization in Container based Security is limited to virtual folder within the container. But with Spring Security we can provide regular expression and secure portions of application.

<http use-expressions="true">
<intercept-url pattern="/**" access="IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY" requires-channel="https"/>
<intercept-url pattern="/secure1/**" access="hasRole('supervisor')"/>
<intercept-url pattern="/secure/**" access="isAuthenticated()" />
</http>

Spring also extends security further to Service layer using a technique called ACL, refer Spring Security document.

If you notice for simple authentication/authorization capabilities container based security is enough, but for more complex enterprise service level security, it make sense to consider Spring Security.

I hope this blog helped.

About these ads

3 thoughts on “Container based Security and Spring Security

  1. Pingback: Spring Security Certificate Authentication Authorization Example | GoSmarter Tech Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s